6. Reading the Church’s Mail

➡ Average Reading Time: 13 minutes
Note: The audio below was recorded in 2007 from the text that follows. However, the text that follows has been edited and may not reflect the same words as the recording.

Let’s reminder. We are not covering the text of Revelation word for word. We are providing a way of thinking and reading Revelation that may help you as you read this book or any other Biblical book.

The Seven Letters 2.1-3.22
The First Vision in Revelation is covered by Revelation 1.9-3.22. The first part of that Vision is the “vivid word picture” of Jesus found in Revelation 1.9-20.

We continue then, with the second part of the first vision in Revelation, which is often called the “letters to the seven churches in Asia Minor.”

Seven Churches of Asia Minor: Revelation 2-3John was personally acquainted with these seven churches in Asia Minor, which is today’s modern Turkey. He knew their history and the conditions surrounding them. These seven churches came into existence during Paul’s ministry at Ephesus as recorded in Acts 19.10. This went on for two years so that all the Jews and Greeks who lived in the province of Asia heard the word of the Lord. (NIV).

These seven churches were all located on a major mail route beginning with Ephesus. The route then traveled north to Smyrna and Pergamum. It then turned southeast to Thyatira and continued on to Sardis, Philadelphia, and finally ending at Laodicea. As we shall see, this is the exact order in which John orders the messages to the churches in the second and third chapters of Revelation.

Westerners live in a culture where the individual is king. We read the Bible looking for those personal nuggets that will help us in times of need. We very seldom read Scripture with a church or our church in mind. However, this is what these two chapters in Revelation are about. They are about the church, not about specific individuals in the church. As an example, we have read the fault of the Ephesian church, abandoning their first love, personally and maybe even corporately. The message here is not about discovering some emotion that you may have had when you discovered Jesus. The message is to the church who has forgotten its roots.

The seven letters were messages of warning and encouragement, which have a structured common plan.

  • In the introduction of each letter, Jesus identifies himself by means of a descriptive phrase, which is taken from the vision in Chapter One. In each case, it is appropriate for the specific church. As an example, let’s compare 1.16 with 2.1.

In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance (Rev. 1.16).

To the angel of the church in Ephesus write: These are the words of him who holds the seven stars in his right hand and walks among the seven golden lamp stands (Rev. 2.1).

This characterization from the vision in Chapter One is usually adapted to the situation in the local church. In this case, the holding of the seven stars in his right hand signifies the care of Jesus for his churches (Rev. 1.20; John 10.28).

  • Jesus gives words of praise for the good qualities he found in the church. There is one exception to this pattern. The church at Laodicea had nothing worthy of praise to be found by Christ.
  • There are also words of criticism for the faults of each church. There are also two exceptions: The church at Smyrna and Philadelphia in which Jesus found no faults.
  • Each letter is addressed to the angel of a specific church. The angels addressed are either the functioning pastors of each church or the term may be regarded as the personifications of the churches.
  • Each of the letters concludes with a promise for those who conquer.

Dispensational writers have taken these letters to be real letters to historical churches, but also see in them a preview of church history as it spirals downward to the lukewarm church at Laodicea. John Walvoord says that to interpret such a progression as a pure accident would be incredible. “The order of the message to the churches seems to be divinely selected to give prophetically the main movement of history” [ref]John Walvoord. The Revelation of Jesus Christ. 52).[/ref] One must note that Walvoord infers this. The context of the text makes no suggestion that the history of the church is in view. The purpose of these letters goes beyond the present instruction to these particular churches in the Roman Empire of the first century. They are designed to impress on the church that it is necessary to be patient and endure in a period of persecution. “He who has an ear…” is a recurring phrase in the letters to each church. This phrase implied that the message, which was given to each church, was meant for a wider audience. The number seven provides the clue that the whole church is in view. The message to these seven churches is the message to the whole church.

One Letter, Many Receivers
When today’s readers read the seven letters, the second and third chapters of Revelation, they invariably want to ask something like: Which church is like ours? It is more likely that your church has some of the positive and negative traits of these seven churches. Remember, John wrote one letter (Revelation) to all the seven churches. Each church read each other’s mail and the mail of the other churches.

The Letter to Ephesus: Abandon First Love. Revelation 2.1-7
Ephesus was a center of sea and land trade. There were three major trade routes that converged in Ephesus. Ephesus was one of the three most influential cities in the eastern part of the Roman Empire, Alexandria in Egypt and Antioch in Syria being the other two. Ephesus was a free city which meant that it had a certain amount of self-rule. Ephesus bragged about its marketplace, stadium, and theater. The theater which overlooked its harbor could seat 2,500 people.

It was the center of Diana worship with one of the seven wonders of the ancient world being the temple of Diana. The temple employed thousands of priests and priestesses many of whom were temple prostitutes for Diana, who was the goddess of fertility. One of the major manufacturing industries in Ephesus was the making of images of its goddess (Acts 19.21-41). In addition, the city was also proud of its imperial cult which saw the ruling Caesar as a god. In John’s time, it would be Domitian.

This is one of those interesting sets of verses that is pulled out of its historical context and quoted as if it were a personal message. We may have been told, “The reason you are having this difficulty is that you have abandoned your first love for Jesus.” The text says that Jesus told the Ephesian church (remember, this was not written to an individual) that what he held against them was the abandonment of their first love. We must ask what that first love was.

To understand this fault, we must look at a short overview of the Ephesian church.

  • The book of Acts tells us that Paul taught this church daily for about two years. During that time the seven churches to which John is writing here, were founded. How? Through the evangelistic fervor of the church at Ephesus (Acts 19.10).
  • Later, when he is on his way to Jerusalem, he spoke to the elders from this church and told them that they should stand guard for the truth that they had been given (Acts 20.17-38). In short, they should make sure that they keep true to the doctrines that Paul had delivered to them and not let anyone from inside or outside the church detour them from that purpose.
  • When Paul wrote his letter to Timothy, he commended the church for teaching sound, healthy doctrine (1 Timothy). They had heeded his word. They had turned their attention to guarding the faith, instead of sharing the faith.
They had, for all intents and purposes, become a “one note” church.

It seems for that reason, Jesus found fault with them. Harmony is interesting. It takes two notes to have harmony. One note just doesn’t get it. The church had focused on one thing to the exclusion of the other. They lost their harmony. Producing harmony is truly a work of the Spirit. He called the church to repent and do the things that she had done at first.

The Letter to Smyrna: Thumbs Up! Revelation 2.8-11
Smyrna was a port city that was about thirty-five miles north of Ephesus. Smyrna had an exceptional port on the Aegean Sea that rivaled Ephesus for export business. The modern name for Smyrna is Izmir and it is the only one of the seven cities that is still in existence today. Smyrna was one of the two churches that had no fault attributed to it.

Jesus is described here from the first vision as: “These are the words of him who is the First and the Last, who died and came to life again (Rev. 2.8). This phrase fits the local situation at Smyrna. In 600 BC the city was destroyed and lay barren until 300 BC. Its name means “myrrh” a substance used in ancient burials. The reference to “crown of life” would have stood out because Smyrna was famous for its games in which the winner received a “crown.”

Smyrna was praised because they had withstood the slander of the evil one. They would be cast into prison and would suffer persecution for ten days. Ten days was a symbolic way of saying their imprisonment would not be forever. It would be completed. If they died without recanting, they would receive the prize of life after death. Those who were persecuting could not touch real life. This was a message of comfort for them.

The Letter to Pergamum: Following False Teachers. Revelation 2.12-17
Pergamum was about forty miles around the coast of the Aegean Sea and then ten miles inland. It was the next stop for a letter carrier. It was an impressive city built on a hill about one thousand feet in height, which created a natural fortress. It rivaled Ephesus as the leading city in its region. It was the capital of the province of Asia and the center of culture in Asia.

The problem of the Pergamum church was that some of their members were following the teachings of the Nicolaitans, which was essentially the teaching of Balaam. The city was ruled by Satan instead of the kingdom. In the Old Testament, we find the story of Balaam in Numbers 22.1-24.25. The Moabite king, Balak, was being threatened by the Israelites. He invited Balaam to prophetically curse Israel. God restrained Balaam and, instead of allowing Balaam to curse Israel, God caused Balaam to bless Israel. This disgusted Balak. Because of Balaam, Israel became involved in sexual license and the idolatrous worship of Baal. These sins were attributed to the advice of Balaam to Balak (Num. 25.1-3; 31.16). The sin of Balaam was the promotion of idolatry and immorality. The Nicolaitans (nick-oh-LAY-ih-tuns) were an early Christian heretical sect, which was made up of the followers of Nicolas. He was possibly a deacon (Acts 6.5) who had gone astray. The Nicolaitans are mentioned only two times in Revelation (Rev. 2.6, 14-15).

The error of the Nicolaitans was moral rather than doctrinal. Many believe that their teaching of sexual laxity was an easy message to entertain in a world of sexual laxity. It seems here, as with the Corinthian church earlier, that the church had not impregnated the world as it should have, but the world had impregnated the church as it should not have.

While the exact issues are different, similar compromises face the church today. Each society has its own “idols” that it expects all its citizens to worship, whether those idols be the government itself or some values or practices of the society. These “idols” are the places at which the values of the society conflict with total allegiance to Christ. Furthermore, the Nicolaitans are still with us under a variety of names, for there are always people who in the name of being “realistic” or under any number of other theological justifications counsel compromise with the dominant culture. This passage warns us that Jesus will not “buy” these justifications. He demands nothing less than total loyalty to his own person and directions. Anything less than this will put those who compromise in danger of his judgment. [ref]Kaiser, W. C. Hard Sayings of the Bible. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity. 1997. 761)[/ref]

Take a moment to pitch in for Winn Griffin on Patreon!
■ First, click on the button below.
■ Second, on the Patreon page, click on Patreon button in upper right corner.
■ Finally, follow the instructions there.

Copy Protected by Chetan's WP-Copyprotect.

Read Me First


Throughout these sessions, I have used the word ecclesia (singular) for the usual word church and ecclesiae (plural) to indicate a church in a particular geographic place, i.e., the ecclesiae at Corinth, meaning the whole of the many smaller ecclesia that met in homes in Corinth. This is to distinguish between the Institutional Church model (IC) and ecclesia that meet in cities and towns around the world. The ecclesiae written about by the authors of the Second Testament were not the same as what the “church” has become over the years of its existence. Usually, but not always, folks think of a church as a place where they go to a building and set in rows of pews and listen to music and sometimes sing and listen to sermons by a pastor or senior pastor. The ecclesiae of the Second Testament time did not invoke this model.


I have discovered over the years that if you want to try and change minds about something special, you have to venture out and reword it in order to grasp a foothold for a new refreshed understanding of the idea presented by the word. Such is the case between "church" and "ecclesia."


Happy Reading!

Read Me Second


Referenced verses in the text of this study are not used to prove some point of view. They are merely markers where the subject matter is referenced by other books and authors. To gain a larger view of each quote, a serious student of the Holy Writ would take the time to view the reference and see what the background is. The background provides tracks on which the meaning of a text rides. So knowing the context of a referenced passage would help the reader to gain a more thorough understanding of an author than just the words quoted and marked by a verse number that was not a part of the original author's text, which as you might remember was performed on the text in a random fashion many years later.


Happy Reading!

Read Me Third


The verses that are referenced in these sessions are not meant to prove a point. They are simply pointers to where the idea being written about may have a correlation. In order to see if they accomplish the thesis presented by the original author, a student should read, at a minimum, the chapter in which the verse is found as well as trying to ascertain what the original author may have meant to say to the original audience.


Of course, this is a lot of work but it is beneficial work. If one does not understand what the author meant when it was written and the audience could not have understood by what was written, then the words on the page can mean anything that a present reader may assign as a meaning, thus distorting what God was inspiring for the original writer to write to the original audience to hear.

A great and recent book by N.T. Wright and Michael F. Bird entitled The New Testament in Its World would be a wonderful addition to your reading helps.


Happy Reading!

Jesus Followers


There are many synonyms to use for the word believer, which is the most common word for a person who has "converted" to follow Jesus. I have chosen "Jesus follower(s) or follower(s) of Jesus instead of the word believer in these presentations to allow the reader an opportunity to move away from the idea of believer which conjures up the possible thought of "ascent" to a set of doctrines that have been assembled by different groups over the centuries and show up in this day and age as a set of statements posted on web sites and other written material. These sets of beliefs are suggested by many as the ones that one should ascent to so that upon death the one who assents can go to heaven, i.e., just believe and you are good to go. Jesus followers/followers of Jesus suggest an action that one should take. Remember, Jesus told his disciples to follow him. Yes, belief is important, but one must move beyond belief to action.


(See "Discipleship" Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels. 182-188.)